Natalie Heller Mills is, by every measure she has designed, perfect. Her Idaho farmhouse photographs in that honeyed, heirloom-linen light that makes followers sigh and reach for their wallets. Her six children are beautiful and well-behaved. And her husband, a senator\u2019s son, tips his cowboy hat on camera with practiced sincerity. Eight million people watch her press herbs into sourdough dough and believe every word of it.<\/p>\n
What they cannot see: the industrial oven tucked behind a cabinet door, the nannies managing the children just off-frame, the producer crouched behind a tripod, or the low, grinding fury Natalie keeps behind her smile like a knife in a bread drawer.<\/p>\n
Yesteryear by Caro Claire Burke<\/em> opens on this woman and then pulls the floor out from beneath her. One morning, Natalie wakes to a version of her farmhouse that is wrong in ways she cannot immediately name. The kitchen fire is real. The familiar floorboards are wider, rougher. Children who look like hers call her Mama in voices she does not recognize. The life she has spent years constructing around herself has become a bad copy of itself, and Natalie must decide what she is willing to do to escape it.<\/p>\n The novel\u2019s first movement belongs entirely to Natalie\u2019s voice, and it is genuinely extraordinary. She is brilliant, withering, funny in a way that makes you feel slightly unclean for laughing. Her inner monologue runs at a clip, narrating her farm life the way she would caption an Instagram post: always performing, always just a little ahead of the audience. An ingenious formal device runs throughout \u2014 unnamed interview questions float in and out of the prose, answered only by Natalie\u2019s private thoughts, giving the reader the queasy pleasure of watching someone perform radical transparency while revealing almost nothing.<\/p>\n Burke is careful not to make Natalie a simple figure. She is contemptuous of her followers, yes, and merciless toward women she perceives as competition. But her backstory \u2014 a sharp girl from a conservative community who earned a full scholarship to Harvard, studied global religious history, and then chose, deliberately, to build the exact life that education could have freed her from \u2014 is rendered without easy moral packaging. Yesteryear by Caro Claire Burke<\/em> is not interested in the kind of feminism that simply relocates judgment from one set of choices to another. Natalie chose this. She also had no idea what she was choosing.<\/p>\n What the novel does with its mystery is patient and precise. Rather than dropping Natalie into an obviously supernatural situation, Burke constructs the disorientation brick by brick. The wrongness accumulates. The children have names Natalie does not recognize. The work is harder and older and relentless. There are no mirrors, no phones, no way for Natalie to verify her own existence. Her attempts to reason her way back to solid ground are among the novel\u2019s best passages: equal parts hilarious and heartrending, the thoughts of a woman whose entire skill set has been designed for an audience that is no longer present.<\/p>\n The middle section moves at a deliberate pace, and some readers will feel the momentum slow. Burke is compressing atmosphere rather than accelerating plot. The small horrors accumulate: physical confinement, rationed food, a walking stick carved for her, a child who both is and is not the daughter she remembers. When the full picture finally resolves, it arrives not as a shocking reveal but as a slow, sickening recognition, the kind that makes you go back and re-read the early pages with different eyes.<\/p>\n Voice as structure: Natalie\u2019s narrative voice does not just tell the story; it is the story. The way it sharpens, fractures, and loops back on itself tracks her psychological state more honestly than any omniscient account could. Yesteryear by Caro Claire Burke<\/em> is not without friction. The Harvard flashbacks, while essential to understanding Natalie\u2019s choices, occasionally brake the momentum of a story that has already found its rhythm. A handful of secondary characters are sketched rather than fully inhabited. The media scandal subplot in the novel\u2019s later stages moves quickly enough to feel slightly compressed after the sustained pressure of the middle section.<\/p>\n There is also a tonal shift that some readers will find jarring. The novel opens as social satire of the sharpest kind, migrates into psychological horror, and arrives somewhere near literary tragedy. Burke has the skill to manage this range, but readers who board for the wit of the opening section may find themselves in different territory than they expected, and not all of them will be glad of it.<\/p>\n This is Caro Claire Burke\u2019s first novel. She holds an MFA from the Bennington Writing Seminars and co-hosts a politics and culture podcast<\/a> called Diabolical Lies<\/em>. For an opening act, her command of structure, tonal control, and character voice is striking. The title itself repays attention: Yesteryear Ranch is both the name of Natalie\u2019s branded empire and the place where her reckoning happens, a word that means the recent past already slipping out of reach, which turns out to be exactly the novel\u2019s subject.<\/p>\n Readers drawn to Yesteryear by Caro Claire Burke<\/em> are likely to find a sympathetic audience in:<\/p>\n American Wife<\/em> by Curtis Sittenfeld: Another portrait of a formidable woman whose intelligence and beliefs end up in uncomfortable service of a man\u2019s political ambitions. Yesteryear by Caro Claire Burke<\/em> is the kind of book that asks something of its reader. The laughs are real, and they cost something. The horror is earned rather than engineered. The ending does not resolve into comfort, and it is better for it. Burke has written a novel about performance and faith<\/a> and motherhood and self-deception that refuses to be tidy about any of these things, because none of these things are tidy.<\/p>\n Not every question the book raises gets answered. That is, in the end, the most honest thing about it.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Natalie Heller Mills is, by every measure she has designed, perfect. Her Idaho farmhouse photographs in that honeyed, heirloom-linen light that makes followers sigh and reach for their wallets. Her six children are beautiful and well-behaved. And her husband, a senator\u2019s son, tips his cowboy hat on camera with practiced sincerity. Eight million people watch […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6020","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bookreviews"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bookloves.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6020"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bookloves.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bookloves.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bookloves.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6020"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bookloves.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6020\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bookloves.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6020"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bookloves.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6020"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bookloves.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6020"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}All That Glitters, Curdled<\/h3>\n
The Horror Arrives Like Weather<\/h3>\n
What Burke Gets Devastatingly Right<\/h3>\n
\nThe satire lands without winking: The skewering of influencer culture, performative faith, and the political machinery around \u201ctraditional values\u201d<\/a> is funny precisely because Burke trusts her readers to sit with the discomfort rather than offering relief.
\nStructural precision: Every detail, from Natalie\u2019s obsessive farmhouse renovation to the scripture passages she murmurs under stress, is placed with intention. Nothing is decorative.
\nMaternal ambivalence without apology: Few novels are this honest about the gap between loving your children and finding motherhood suffocating, or about the guilt that trails that gap everywhere.<\/p>\nWhere the Novel Tests Your Patience<\/h3>\n
A Debut That Announces Itself<\/h3>\n
If This Book Found You, These Might Too<\/h3>\n
\nWe Need to Talk About Kevin<\/em> by Lionel Shriver: Unreliable maternal narration, slow-burning dread, and an honest refusal to offer easy sympathy or easy condemnation.
\nLittle Fires Everywhere<\/em> by Celeste Ng: The secrets domestic idealism requires, and the women who keep them.
\nThe Girls<\/em> by Emma Cline: Charisma as manipulation, and the specific vulnerability of young women to curated worlds.
\nThe Stepford Wives<\/em> by Ira Levin: Short, sharp, and the obvious antecedent of every novel about women required to be perfect for reasons that reveal themselves too late.
\nNews of the World<\/em> by Paulette Jiles: For readers pulled specifically by the frontier American setting, this offers a quieter, aching version of similar terrain.<\/p>\nA Novel Worth the Discomfort<\/h2>\n