Doing your own research matters, but so, too, does checking your sources when you do that work. Source checking is a crucial skill, but it can be difficult, even for folks who are well-versed in it. The good news is you can always learn new techniques, and one of the most valuable tools at your disposal for learning is simply asking questions and going down some research rabbit holes.<\/p>\n
Here\u2019s an example of how to check your sources when you read the news. <\/p>\n
A couple of weeks ago, a headline from another outlet that does book censorship link roundups made me pause. It looked like this:<\/p>\n
Below in the roundup, this was the text:<\/p>\n
The outlet that shared this headline, link, and explanation of the link doesn\u2019t matter too much. This isn\u2019t about shaming them. Their work is good and relied upon by professionals nationwide. Instead, this example serves as a prime opportunity to talk about why doing the work of sharing book censorship news is so difficult <\/strong>and why it is that national organizations that track book censorship, including PEN America and the American Library Association, cannot have accurate counts, no matter how hard and well-done their work is. Good outlets can still make mistakes when it comes to sourcing information because we\u2019re swimming in a mis- and dis- information ecosystem. Stepping back to do a deep dive takes time and sometimes additional background knowledge that not everyone has or knows to look for.<\/p>\n This summer, I talked about the work that goes into tracking book censorship and sharing the links every week<\/a> in Literary Activism. It\u2019s not as easy as a tracked Google search. In fact, I don\u2019t track any keywords at all. I keep a list of about 12-15 terms that I do a hand search for every weekday, knowing that the list shifts depending on the information I\u2019m reading about where and how schools, libraries, news media, and book banners themselves are describing book censorship.<\/p>\n The link roundup pictured above was published on September 3, 2026. That week, I kept coming across stories about LGBTQ+ books being banned by KIPP schools in Nashville in my searches. It\u2019s a story that feels<\/em> absolutely true, and it might <\/em>be true. But as of today, three and a half weeks later, there\u2019s still no definitive documentation or news story proving that this actually happened. There\u2019s no proof that addresses how many books were removed, or which books they were. There are plenty of links talking about<\/strong> this book removal, but not a single one has been from a reputable outlet.<\/p>\n The work of sharing book censorship news involves verifying sources, and sometimes that can mean a lot of time spent going nowhere. This story is case in point.<\/p>\n From the very beginning of the example above: The Tennessee Star<\/em>, the site referenced in the image above, is not, in fact, where the linked text goes. The linked text goes to WFMD<\/a>, a Nashville radio station website. Clicking that WFMD link shows the following:<\/p>\n This isn\u2019t an article by anyone on the WFMD team. The byline is \u201cBreaking News on Fox News.\u201d So from the get-go, the source of this news is biased based on the byline alone.<\/p>\n Reading a little bit further, though, that bias is further confirmed. Highlighted and linked terms include \u201cChristian teacher\u201d and \u201creligious views be respected in schools.\u201d These are terms that link to entire categories of news on FoxNews.com: the first to their \u201cfaith-values\u201d reporting, and the second to their \u201cfirst-amendment\u201d category. Fox News has a vested interest in this story because it confirms and promotes their own worldview, and it serves as propaganda in their coordinated attacks on books, libraries, and education.<\/p>\n The Tennessee Star <\/em>is cited in this story, though. Clicking over to the link<\/a> in the Star <\/em>looks like this:<\/p>\n <\/a><\/p>\n As someone who looks at this stuff every single day, I immediately recognize that this is no actual news outlet. For those who don\u2019t swim in these waters, though, it might be harder to make that connection.<\/p>\n Begin with the most basic pieces. The image for the news story isn\u2019t real. It\u2019s an image of someone in a suit pasted over a classroom image (the assumption is that it\u2019s the educator\u2019s photo, superimposed on a classroom background). Something about it feels off, and there\u2019s no image credit anywhere. To the right of that image are two advertisements for political candidates. Both are unabashed in their \u201ctraditional values\u201d stances. As you scroll down the right-hand column, it\u2019s advertisement after advertisement for a host of conservative candidates, as well as for organizations like Tennessee Leads, which advocates \u201cparental choice in education.\u201d<\/p>\n There\u2019s also this interesting promotion:<\/p>\n With an accolade like that, it could be easy to assume that raises the profile of the Tennessee Star<\/em>. Except when you look up what the Dao Prize is, you learn that it\u2019s an arm of the Young America Foundation, one of the most preeminent and controversial groups for young conservatives. <\/p>\n Indeed, the Dao Prize underlines that its mission is to recognize journalists ignored by other organizations and media outlets. Conservatives are always the victims<\/a>, and this prize awards that narrative. <\/p>\n Before we have even looked at the story itself or the website\u2019s about us page, the Tennessee Star <\/em>has made it clear they\u2019re not an unbiased source. Looking at the paper\u2019s \u201cAbout\u201d page<\/a> at the bottom, though, confirms the fact this is a conservative outlet.<\/p>\n And that\u2019s just the text about the Editor-in-Chief. <\/p>\n What we\u2019ve learned from a few clicks before even reading the story is that this newspaper is interested in conservative politics and that it\u2019s one of many newspapers that appear to operate on the local level across the country. It appears there are 14 similar papers. <\/p>\n Reading the actual story further confirms that there\u2019s no story here at all. Or at least, the story this is purportedly about is not what the story tells readers. This is a story about an educator at KIPP\u2013a public charter school<\/strong>\u2013who won a lawsuit against the school. It is not about books being removed from the school library. Here\u2019s the beginning of the Tennessee Star\u2019s <\/em>reporting:<\/p>\n The word \u201cremoved\u201d links to a press release from First Liberty Institute. The First Liberty Institute is \u201cthe largest legal organization in the nation dedicated exclusively to defending religious liberty for all Americans. We believe that every American of any faith\u2014or no faith at all\u2014has a fundamental right to follow their conscience and live according to their beliefs.\u201d Among the victories this conservative Christian legal organization touts on its website<\/a>? The time the Supreme Court ruled that a bakery owner was allowed to discriminate against a queer couple. So yes, while it\u2019s true that First Liberty Institute is a nonprofit, it\u2019s certainly not without bias; nonprofit does not equate to nonpartisan.<\/p>\n Bias of the legal time aside, the press release<\/a> tells a slightly different story than what is reported in the Star<\/em>.<\/p>\n The educator at the center of the story reached out to First Liberty earlier this year when KIPP, his employer, asked him to read from two books in the curriculum that mentioned same-sex marriage. It was against his sincerely held religious beliefs. That belief, plus the state\u2019s \u201cparental consent\u201d laws, would make a good case that his rights were violated (who cares about the students or their parents who may not agree, but that\u2019s neither here nor there).<\/p>\n The press release states the following: <\/p>\n The school agreed in March 2026 to provide reasonable religious accommodations to all staff, and now, they have eliminated books that could violate Tennessee law regarding parental consent.<\/p>\n [\u2026]<\/p>\n [H]e objected to two books featuring same-sex marriage. Following a demand letter from First Liberty, the school agreed to accommodate any reasonable religious requests. Further, in light of Tennessee law requiring parental consent to the teaching of sexual orientation or gender identity, KIPP Nashville proactively informed the Tennessee Attorney General\u2019s Office that it removed substantial controversial materials, including numerous books, from its 2026-2027 curriculum in an effort to respect the religious beliefs of its staff, students, and parents.<\/p>\n Nowhere in this press release are the titles of the books that were removed from the curriculum listed. There were two, and neither was from the library, as reported by the Star<\/em>. The First Liberty Institute further noted that the State Attorney General confirmed that KIPP removed \u201cnumerous books\u201d from its curriculum for the 2026-2027 school year.<\/p>\n There\u2019s a lot to unpack in that statement, beginning with the fact that this still wasn\u2019t the library, as reported by the Star <\/em>(and repeated by Fox News, which then spread onto other \u201cnews\u201d sites). It was the curriculum, which operates differently and independently from the library. But using the word \u201clibrary\u201d allows this story to land on search results pages and captures the known attention being paid to book censorship in libraries<\/strong>.<\/p>\n Another thing worth noting is that neither the press release nor the State Attorney General names the books removed from the curriculum (we will get there). The Tennessee State Attorney is one of the signatories on an Amicus Brief in a case currently in the 11th Circuit<\/a> related to Florida\u2019s book bans. This means he\u2019s among those eager to force book censorship wherever and however he wishes in Tennessee\u2013and last fall, we saw Tennessee\u2019s Secretary of State demanding book removals in public libraries statewide<\/a> in response to Trump\u2019s Executive Order on \u201cDefending Women from Gender Ideology.\u201d<\/p>\n At this point, the story doesn\u2019t add up, and none of its sources deserve to be taken seriously. So now it\u2019s time to do another search, this time using keywords related to the misinformation to see if we can find a better source.<\/p>\n It\u2019s worth mentioning a couple of additional important factors here, too. First, KIPP is a public school, so it is possible to submit public records requests. This is a key tool in uncovering book censorship, and it\u2019s a key tool reporters use to share these stories with verified facts. Second, and especially important here, Tennessee restricts those public records requests to state residents<\/a>. That means anyone without a Tennessee address cannot request those materials, limiting who may verify these reports and stories (more accurately, non-residents can request them, but can be easily denied).<\/p>\n Here\u2019s what a new search for a story about the removal of LGBTQ+ books from KIPP Nashville, time restricted to the date of the First Institute\u2019s press release (August 28, 2026) and the start of this week (September 21, 2026). <\/p>\n Fox News, The Center Square (a conservative outlet focused on \u201ctaxpayer sensibility\u201d), Christian Post, Yahoo (reposting a National Enquirer<\/em> story<\/a> that names one of the books Rivera refused to read as In Our Mothers\u2019 House<\/em>), and a site called Belief Net pop up in this search. Trying various combinations of those same keywords brings up the same few sources.<\/p>\n When you expand the search beyond Google\u2019s News tab, it doesn\u2019t get better:<\/p>\n Now there are even more blatant pro-religious sites popping up sharing the same story. The CBN story (Christian Broadcast Network, not to be confused with CBS)\u2013both the video and the link seen in the image above\u2013does shed light on the second title that Rivera refused to read, Stella Brings the Family<\/em>. <\/p>\n There is one outlier. A YouTube link to a page called Queer News Tonight\u2013a queer nonprofit outlet\u2013claims that KIPP removed 20 titles from the curriculum<\/a>. They don\u2019t cite where they get this number, nor name the books. It\u2019s the only outlet that gives a number, begging the question of where that came from. Interestingly, they reference the SCOTUS bakery case, which was handled by the same group representing this educator.<\/p>\n Again, there\u2019s zero question that at least two books were removed. But they were removed from the curriculum and not from the library. It is very possible that other LGBTQ+ books were removed. But not a single outlet has done more than parrot the talking points provided by the First Liberty Institute. That is not an unbiased source, and their goal in getting the word out is to continue planting the seed into the minds of news consumers that there are \u201cnaughty\u201d books in schools and school libraries and that people\u2019s religious liberties are at stake by sending their children to public schools.<\/p>\n The pro-\u201ceducational choice\u201d ad on the Tennessee Star<\/em>\u2018s page was no accident. <\/p>\n Accuracy and confirming information matter. It can look easy to round up links and share them, but it\u2019s not. Accidents happen, and failing to fully investigate one\u2019s sources can lead to sharing inaccurate information. But we are all responsible for learning to be media literate and news-savvy. Taking the time to walk back through stories when they\u2019re shared can teach you untold amounts about where and how news is told, and whether it should be shared as fact.<\/p>\n Professional news has been withering for decades, and we\u2019re in an era where more and more consumers get their news from social media, rather than from professional journalists. We\u2019re also struggling beneath the reality of needing paywalls to sustain news media, with the fact that right-wing outlets have untold amounts of money that allow them to spread their lies and misinformation widely and freely.<\/p>\n Always look at who is telling the story and what benefit they get from it. In the case of KIPP removing books from the library in Nashville, it\u2019s First Institute, it\u2019s right-wing news rags, and it\u2019s folks who\u2019ve been spewing the same \u201cparental rights\u201d nonsense in an effort to defund public institutions for years. There\u2019s no question that there\u2019s been book censorship here; the question is what that actually entails, and no one has provided a real answer yet. This is a story crafted from a press release written by a source with a vested interest in spreading lies and encouraging fear in the minds of those doing their jobs as educators and librarians. <\/p>\n Related: How to Read a Press Release from the Federal Government<\/a><\/em>.<\/p>\n Related: How to Own a News Cycle<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n A Judge has given the green light for the lawsuit in Utah over the state law banning books from all schools to move forward<\/a>. This is the one where several authors sued when their titles were removed. We\u2019ll see what happens here, and I know I\u2019m especially interested if we\u2019ll see a flurry of additional titles banned in the interim. That\u2019s what happened when the lawsuit was filed earlier this year. <\/p>\n The Florida Department of Education released the annual list of books banned at school districts across the state<\/a>. The article here notes how there\u2019s such a divide between schools banning en mass and those not banning at all in the state. (One of my books was banned in three districts). <\/p>\n The First Circuit was troubled by Trump\u2019s plans to dismantle four federal agencies\u2013including the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS)\u2013but they couldn\u2019t articulate what going \u201ctoo far\u201d meant. This is an interesting development<\/a> in one of the two federal lawsuits against the dismantling of the IMLS, Rhode Island v. Trump<\/em>\u2013Trump\u2019s team appealed, saying that they had to right to implement executive orders under the Administrative Procedures Act (the thing that the original decision said they did not have the right to do). <\/p>\n After demanding schools remove books from the \u201cstate\u2019s list\u201d of over 2,200 titles, Texas\u2019s Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick is now claiming he didn\u2019t say that there\u2019s a list and that books like Night <\/em>are fine to be in schools. Whoops<\/a>. <\/p>\n Residents in Alamance County, North Carolina, are concerned how many conservatives have been appointed to the library board and how that doesn\u2019t represent the county<\/a>. <\/p>\n The fight over The Perks of Being a Wallflower <\/em>staying or being removed from Readington School District (NJ) is so intense that a police officer will be at every board meeting the rest of the year<\/a>. Recall\u2026New Jersey has an anti-book banning law. <\/p>\n The real news from this year\u2019s release of the books banned in Florida schools last school year is that TWO districts accounted for 66% of the total bans<\/a>. Those districts are naturally ones where some of the national book banning leaders complain on the regular. <\/p>\n We always know the ban on trans books for minors in Alabama public libraries would never be \u201cjust\u201d the trans books for minors. It\u2019s all trans books, and those coordinating this on behalf of the GOP\u2013the Alabama Public Library Service in this case\u2013are eager to engage in the censorship. Librarians are pushing back<\/a>. <\/p>\n Knox County Schools (TN) are redoing their review committees<\/a>\u2013something they vowed to do following the removal of Roots <\/em>in the district. This committee\u2019s structure is going to take a lot of work to accomplish, and they\u2019ll be trained on how to ensure materials are aligned with the state\u2019s laws on age-appropriate materials. But there\u2019s a helluva line here that begs the question of whether or not a committee reviewing books for appropriateness to a law created by a right-wing conspiracy theory can ever be<\/strong> neutral: \u201cMembers will also receive training from an outside legal expert to help ensure the review process remains neutral.\u201d<\/p>\n This is a really good piece about the realities of librarianship and bookselling in Arkansas under ACT 372<\/a>: \u201cThe political rhetoric behind this law has been directed at libraries and librarians, not corporations like Walmart and Target, who sell these same sexually explicit \u201charmful\u201d books for profit. In fact, some who defend Act 372 deny that they are banning books by pointing out that the books they are censoring in libraries are still available for purchase. This is a culture war crusade against libraries, not corporate book-sellers. I don\u2019t want any of the nearly 1,700 employees who work at the more than 225 public libraries in Arkansas to be prosecuted. Even if they are ultimately acquitted, the process would be frightening and scarring.\u201d<\/p>\n The Human Rights Defense Center is suing Dallas County, Sheriff Marian Brown and Chief Deputy Shane Sowell (TX) for their new rules creating a near total ban on books and periodicals for those experiencing incarceration<\/a> in the county. <\/p>\n Hollidaysburg Area School Board (PA) is finally allowing an AP Human Geography textbook to be approved for use in the classroom. Why was it denied before, you may ask? You know why\u2013a board member crying that the book\u2019s inclusion of gender identity is \u201cindoctrination.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n King George County Schools (VA) wanted to deny middle schoolers the right to a GSA club. The students were suing and before litigation were to happen, guess what the school decided to allow<\/a>? There is legal precedent for GSA and other Rainbow Clubs legally, thanks to the Equal Access Act of 1989, section 20<\/a>.<\/p>\n Peoria Unified School District (AZ) will reconsider their anti-DEI policies, renaming them something that is\u2026also pretty anti-DEI. All of this stems from the banning of several books by marginalized authors in the district<\/a>. <\/p>\n The 10th US Court of Appeals is allowing an Oklahoma law limiting discussions of race and sex in the classroom to proceed<\/a>. The judges\u2019 interpretation of this law is certainly generous, given all we know about how republicans actually interview their vague laws as broadly as possible. This one will create a further chilling effect on the books and lessons educators provide students for fear of litigation. <\/p>\n \u201cThe public library is not an ideology. It is not woke. It is not radical,\u201d he said. \u201cIt is just the public library. The public encompasses all of the community \u2014 community that you either agree with or you disagree with.\u201d Such a great line here. This is from a piece about the latest on the attempts to privatize Fresno Public Library<\/a> (CA), which has been under attack from right-wing panic manufacturers for years. <\/p>\n This is a great piece from Stephana Ferrell about what\u2019s really meant by \u201cyou can just buy the book<\/a>\u201d in debates about banning books in school and public libraries.<\/p>\n The Library Association of Alberta is encouraging libraries to close on October 1 in protest of the province\u2019s new law banning all books with \u201cgraphic sexual content\u201d for those under 15<\/a>. A reminder no such thing exists. <\/p>\n In prison censorship news, the Sixth Circuit is reviving a lawsuit from an incarcerated individual who says his rights were violated when a mailroom clerk confiscated a book from him. The book was written by the individual\u2019s sister<\/a>. <\/p>\n The Caldwell County Board of Education (NC) has updated the district\u2019s book challenge policies to align with the state\u2019s new requirements. Now it permits even more people to file challenges to books they don\u2019t like, including school board members and county residents who don\u2019t have students in the district<\/a>.<\/p>\n Hillsborough County School Board (FL) has a new round of book challenges from a local book banner.<\/a> The pastor from North Carolina who brags about being the \u201cbook banning pastor\u201d made an appearance at the show, too. <\/p>\n Just read this page on the Cobb County School District (GA) webpage spreading the GOP\u2019s talking points about books and what is or isn\u2019t appropriate in schools. This is the playbook, now policy in a school district. Miller Test who now<\/a>? The district removed The Bluest Eye <\/em>from school libraries<\/a>. Note the superintendent insists that the ban on Morrison\u2019s classic is not a book ban<\/a>. <\/p>\n The Topeka and Shawnee County Public Library (KS) saw their library board meeting swarmed by the local GOP who is demanding that books in the collection be moved or removed<\/a>. They\u2019re \u201cprotecting the children.\u201d Remember this is the same GOP protecting pedophiles, so you gotta ask which is it, the children or the children violators? <\/p>\n Wake County Schools (NC) are interpreting a new state law in such a way that should be noted. No longer can parents complain to get books banned from school libraries<\/a>. They can only get their<\/em> kids\u2019 access to the book halted. <\/p>\n \u201cSuperintendent Cabral said his concern about the implementation of the policies arose after he received a list of books and was asked to determine which titles should be considered controversial and require an opposing viewpoint. Among the titles discussed were books about Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce, Barack Obama and other public figures, as well as works of fiction such as The Blood of Olympus<\/em> by Rick Riordan and Insurgent<\/em> by Veronica Roth. \u201cI don\u2019t have a problem with balanced books and I know we have a policy,\u201d Cabral said during the discussion. \u201cBut what was being asked of me is to look at these lists of books and deem them controversial and then provide a balance.\u201d\u201d This is in Redlands Unified School District in California<\/a>, where right-wing members of the school board have been obsessed with banning books and \u201cbalancing opinions\u201d in the library collections for years. Recall that the state has an anti-book ban law. <\/p>\n And as an update to the above, the Redlands board has passed their new policy to \u201cbalance\u201d content in the libraries<\/a>. A real quote from a real person on the board: \u201c\u201cThis thing has gone so far off the rails in our libraries (is that content) is either neutral or far left-leaning,\u201d Olson said Tuesday. \u201c\u2026 What if it was all right-wing content in the library? \u2026 I also wouldn\u2019t appreciate that. I don\u2019t think we should have (books that lean) all right or on the left. This is a problem we should tackle. Our families would appreciate that. We lose people all the time because we don\u2019t have balance in our schools.\u201d\u201d<\/p>\n Davis Joint Unified School District (CA) has been dealing with a woman complaining about trans books in the school library catalog. This editorial is interesting in that it puts those complaints in context<\/a>\u2013what does the number of books popping up under a library catalog search even mean? Relatedly, California has a ban on book bans based on ideological or political reasons. <\/p>\n The MyCentralJersey.com editorial board has written a piece about why the state deserves better than a culture war over books<\/a>. Again, worth reiterating that New Jersey has a ban on book bans. If these things are being passed, they also need to be enforced. Maryland\u2019s doing it. Other states can, too. <\/p>\n The Summit County Library Board of Directors (UT) will not be banning the book Sex Is a Funny Word <\/em>from shelves<\/a>. <\/p>\n Here\u2019s a good piece from a writer who has been reading through the 20 books banned by Elizabeth School District<\/a> (CO)\u2013a school currently involved in a lawsuit over their rights to ban whatever books they wish. What makes this piece good is it outright explains how claims of inappropriate content are nothing but a game of telephone and the school shows its double standards through the other books it requires in English classes. <\/p>\n \u201cThe Arkansas Department of Corrections will shift its focus away from creating a policy restricting access to physical books<\/a> in an effort to prevent illegal drugs from entering prisons, officials told the state corrections board Monday.\u201d They\u2019re still going to make it easier to punish third parties helping provide materials to those on the inside, and the corrections board chair really doesn\u2019t want folks writing headlines about them banning books. The article is a good read for understanding the issue. <\/p>\n A Texas state representative pressured the University of North Texas to remove a web resource from its library webpage about LGBTQ+ history. The pride these bigots have not only in spreading lies but in erasing history tells you the whole story.<\/a> <\/p>\n The ACLU of Iowa has released a handy sheet for folks trying to navigate the anti-LGBTQ+ law, SF 496. Here\u2019s what the law does and does not mean when it comes to book bans<\/a>. <\/p>\n The Missouri Supreme Court will decide the legality of the state law<\/a> that has led to widespread book banning. <\/p>\n Citizens of Bridgewater, New Jersey, showed up to the latest board meeting to defend their school librarians. Why? Because there\u2019ve been complaints over books in the libraries. This is all these people have<\/a>. <\/p>\nBook Censorship News: September 25, 2026<\/h2>\n